<<<Home Maxims Directory

 

Continuation of Commentaries

on the Maxims on Love of St. John of the Cross

by Fr. Bruno Cocuzzi, ocd

Maxim 18

The soul that walks in love neither rests nor grows tired.

 

We are all familiar with the phrase: "To BE in love."  Here we discover that it is possible "to walk in love."  What could be the difference between those two phrases?  Hopefully, by understanding what it is to BE in love, we can form an accurate idea of what it is to walk in love.

 

It seems to me that, first of all, to be means to exist and nothing more.  All the emphasis is on the fact alone that a thing or person really exists.  The concept of being leaves aside the idea of that person or thing acting or being acted upon.  In fact, the concept of being, all by itself, even leaves aside any further notion of quality or attribute.  To be , therefore, taken all alone merely states that someone or something is real and substantial.  The fact of being, therefore, is not a quality or an attribute.  Qualities or attributes cannot exist as real and substantial all by themselves.  Qualities and attributes always and only exist as distinguishing features of substantial beings.

 

So in this Maxim 18, it is the soul that has a separate existence, considered apart from any of its attributes.  But it is this same maxim that reminds us that one of the qualities that can distinguish a soul, is that it is in love.  Let us consider that before we go on to consider what it means to walk and then, to walk in love.

 

It seems to me that to be in love signifies a very special kind of quality in a person (or soul).  It signifies a very special "orientation" in that soul.  Of course, the entire notion of orientation is something complex, and therefore not easy to grasp in its entirety.  But let's do the best we can!

 

A person in love is oriented to the one person, the beloved.  I say one person, because it is impossible to be in love, that is for us human beings, to be in love with more than one beloved at the same time.  As Jesus told us: "you cannot love God and money."  Even though Jesus is speaking about money as something impersonal, and thus as something that cannot be loved in the strict sense, because only "persons" are capable of loving and being loved, nevertheless His statement tells us that to be in love is an orientation toward a specific person that necessarily excludes every other person as the object of love.  Or better, we can love many, many people and we are obliged to love everyone, both friend and foe, but we can only be "in love" with one person.

 

The orientation then, that we have where we are "in love," consists in first,  desiring or wanting always to be united with, or at least always to be in the presence of the beloved.

 

2nd, desiring what is good for the beloved, what is in the best interests of the beloved.

 

3rd, desiring that the beloved is always pleased, that is, that the beloved experience happiness.

 

4th, the orientation we call being in love includes making the beloved the object of all the faculties of our being.  All the faculties includes those both of soul and of body.  A person "in love" thinks always of the beloved - keeps the ideas it has formed of the beloved always in mind.  A person in love remembers the beloved, not only the memory of sense experiences of the beloved, but also the memory of the times the lover has been with the beloved and done things with the beloved.  A person in love takes on the value system of the beloved, and interprets everything else in terms of its relationship to the beloved, that is, in terms of whether it is good for the beloved and capable of making the beloved happy.

 

With regard to the faculties of the body, being in love is the orientation that places them at the service of the Beloved.  The service of the beloved means all the deeds and activities that factually contribute to promoting the personal well being of the beloved in soul and body, and also which promote the interests of the Beloved and which make the Beloved happy.

 

5th, to sum up all the above, to be  in love means ceasing to exist for oneself and existing only for the Beloved.  Being in love means "Being FOR the beloved"..

 

Having said all that, it seems to me we can identify all of the above with the admonition of Holy Scripture, re-affirmed by Jesus Himself.  Thou shalt love the Lord Thy God with your whole mind, your whole heart, your whole soul, and with all your strength.  In effect that statement says:  Be IN LOVE with God.

 

Let us go on now to consider what it means "to walk in love."

 

One very simple meaning would be to say:  "a person in love who is walking."  But obviously, it means more than that.  We know that St. Teresa of Jesus defines Humility as "Walking in truth."  Also, we hear of spiritual people speak of their relationship with God, or the working out of their personal relationship with God as "my walk."  Therefore, in both cases, "to walk in truth" and "my walk" consist of a mode of conduct that engages the whole personality, the entire humanity of the "walker," not just his feet.

 

So where a person who is humble walks in truth.  It means "excluding" and keeping out of one's deeds and relationship anything that is false, anything that would be equivalent to living a lie.  It would certainly mean never claiming as a basis for our rights, duties, and entitlements anything that is not the truth as revealed by God in scripture and tradition.  In traditional Catholic doctrine on the spiritual life and quest for holiness, Walking in Truth means:  knowing who we are, knowing Who God is, knowing our limitations, our weaknesses and our strength, knowing that of ourselves we are nothing and can do no good thing and that God alone is the source of all our good, our natural and supernatural life, and any good we have ever done.

 

Thus, it seems that "walking in love" means, at least, sincerely trying to put all the faculties of body and soul at the service of the Beloved.  But since it is rare that we find a person who is "perfectly" in love with God, walking in love would include making sincere efforts to orient our entire being and doing totally and completely around God, or in equivalent terms, around Jesus, that not the slightest disorder can be found in our love for Him.

 

Now how are we to understand the final half of the maxim: "neither rests nor grows tired."

 

To get an answer, let us consider when it is we rest.  As you all know, the only time we crave or seek to rest is when we are tired.  To rest, then, means to cease activities that cause us to become weary or fatigued.

 

Another meaning of "to rest" is to be in a state of inactivity.  It is quite possible for us to be able to choose from among several options.  We may have the opportunity or the freedom to engage in one of several different types of activity, among which is to refrain from any activity, and thus to rest.

 

With regard to the first, St. John of the Cross seems to be saying that if we truly love, if we truly have put all the faculties of our being at the service of God, Our Beloved, we never grow weary or fatigued, so we never rest, nor do we desire to rest.

 

With regard to the second meaning, St. John seems to be saying that a soul "walking in love" never has, never allows itself to have the option of ceasing to put all its energies and faculties at the service of the Beloved.

 

Does this create a difficulty?  Do we know of anyone who does not grow tired, or who never has a lawful option to do nothing?  What about Jesus?  He personally would go off by Himself to pray and rest.  He invited His Apostles: come apart (that is - come away from the crowds -) and rest with Me awhile.  Certainly He walked in love; certainly He was training the Apostles to walk in LOVE.  Thus, it seems that St. John+ is wrong when he says "the soul that walks in love neither rests nor grows tired."

 

Well, as you've probably already noticed, this maxim does not say: the entire humanity of a person who walks in love neither rests nor grows tired.  It says:  the soul.  Our soul is something entirely spiritual.  Pure spirits do not have "parts' which can wear out.  Nor does the soul have muscles that grow weary as their cells are depleted of energy and have to be revitalized.  The faculties of the soul are created to enable the soul to nourish itself on Truth, Beauty and Goodness, or more accurately, it is through the occupation of Intellect, Memory and Will. with Truth, Beauty and Goodness that the soul LIVES.  Thus, when a soul walking in LOVE is occupied with its Beloved:  Infinite and Perfect Truth, Beauty and Goodness, it is ALIVE, it lives a joyful LIFE.  So what St. John+ says applies to the soul, a spirit, and indeed, only to the highest powers of the soul:  intellect, memory, and will.

 

There is a lower aspect of the soul that is intimately related to the senses and sense perceptions.  Those are the emotions.  All of the emotions have an influence on the body, the other, the material component of our humanity.  We know that certain emotions and feelings that register in our souls can cause stress and concomitant physiological changes in the body.  Certainly these feelings and emotions were present in the life of Jesus, the Incarnate Word.  So they would have been in need of rest, along with His body's need of rest.

 

Of course, what would have caused emotional weariness and fatigue in Jesus' Humanity and certainly causes it in each and every one of us, is the experience of evil.  Evil, as you know, is the absence of a good that should be present.  Jesus, being more perceptive and sensitive must have had His soul, that aspect of His human soul where the emotions are experienced, terribly wearied and even wounded by His encounter with sinful human beings.  We ourselves can testify to how our souls are burdened and fatigued and sometimes crushed by the experience of evil in our lives.  (As an aside - when the awareness of our own evil deeds crushes our souls then we are said to be contrite).  So though it is true Jesus went apart to pray and rest as a means of overcoming the fatigue and weariness caused Him by His public ministry, He was concerned more about the emotional renewal of His soul through communion with His Father in prayer, than with the physiological renewal of His Sacred Body in sleep.  And we ourselves have to admit in all honesty, that often we have recourse to prayer, especially contemplative prayer, precisely because we want to restore the emotional well-being and strength of our souls.  When we do engage in contemplative prayer, that is when we allow Intellect, Memory & Will to rest in the embrace of God as Truth, Beauty and Goodness through Faith, Hope and Charity, we do experience the alleviation of stress and other forms of emotional fatigue and are enabled to continue our "walking in LOVE" with renewed fervor and enthusiasm.

 

This is proof that when the higher faculties of the soul are occupied with God, they not only do not rest or grow tired, they actually are busy at work renewing the "life" so to speak, of the lower faculties of the soul.

 

But perhaps, in a sense, we can say that even the body's faculties and the lower faculties of the soul neither rest nor g row weary when the soul "walks in love."  If walking in love really means putting our entire being at the service of the Beloved, then, even when we go to sleep, even when we eat and drink and take some wholesome recreation, if we do it for the express purpose of enabling us to fulfill the manifold duties of our state in life, all for the purpose of promoting the interests of Our Beloved and seeking to please Him, and of deepening our union with Him, we are dedicating tired limbs and emotionally drained psyche's to His service.

 

P.S.  About Mother Theresa of Calcutta, who saw Jesus, her Beloved in everyone.

***************************

<<<Home Maxims Directory

MISSION STATEMENT: This web site was created for the purpose of completing the work of Fr. Bruno Cocuzzi, O.C.D These conferences may be reproduced for private use only. Publication of this material is forbidden without permission of the Father Provincial for the Discalced Carmelites, Holy Hill, 1525 Carmel Rd., Hubertus, WI 53033-9770. Texts for the Maxims on Love were taken from The Collected Works of St. John of the Cross, by Fr. Kieran Kavanaugh, O.C.D. and Fr. Otilo Rodriguez, O.C.D. 1979 Edition. Copies of the book are available at ICS Publications, 2131 Lincoln Rd., N.E., Washington, D.C. 2002-1199, Phone: 1-800-832-8489.